Pastor Hart's Message

Sermon: Taking Tests--Our Lenten Jouney in the Wilderness, Luke 4:1-13

I am not at all a big fan of tests. Academic, medical, endurance, character, you name it, if there is a test involved and my signature has to go on the top of the page, I'm not very happy about having to put it there.

This dislike of mine has deep roots--from my earliest memories--1st grade, maybe?--of having my teacher unsmilingly hand out wide-spaced composition paper; of having to wait, number-two pencil in sweaty hand, butterflies in fluttery stomach, lonely and anxious there at my little, formica-topped desk, waiting for that dreaded first ax to fall:
What does 2+2 equal?
How do you spell cat?
Who was the first president of the United States?

And then, once the test was over, the now-smudgy, eraser-torn paper turned humbly and vulnerably face down on the desk; there to be collected and consigned back into the solemn care of the teacher to be mercilessly graded and marked.

And then, days later, of having to sit there once more at my lonely spot, waiting again all sweaty and butterfly-y for it to be returned to me, inscribed in red with a letter grade at the top, and, if you were lucky (well, if you had studied anyway), not slashed with angry red x-es all over your work.

And the funny thing about this dislike of tests of mine was that I was actually a good student, a conscientious student (maybe a little too conscientious some of you might be thinking right now). Except for math, particularly the times-tables which were my particular undoing, I got very few red slashes and usually didn't have to worry too much about showing my parents my test results.

So it wasn't that I was a bad student, or that I was even a bad test-taker. It wasn't that I thought all teachers were grim and merciless sadists--after all, some of the most influential people in my life, including my own beloved father, ahve been teachers.

No, it was just that I hated the whole lonely test-taking process, and I continued to hate it through 20-plus years of continued education, as I still do today--
as I think many people do, too.

LIke many, maybe even like most people, I suspect--although come to think of it, there was always that one kid in school who would raise their hand in class to say: "Miss Blumgarten, wasn't there supposed to be a test today?"

Whereupon all the other kids would groan and smack their foreheads with their hands and shoot that poor kid such looks that if looks could actually kill, he'd have never made it though elementary school. And if he did somehow manage to make it through elementary school, then he'd be maybe like the bridegroom-to-be for whom, along with his fiance, I once provided premarital counseling--who when I handed them both copies of a Premarital Inventory to fill out and said to them--in order to allay any anxiety, I thought--
"Please don't think of this as taking a test"--

This bridegroom-to-be who replied happily, "Oh, I love taking tests!"

So, of course there are these exceptions--and if any of you reading this are one of them, then I heartily apologize for my blatant over-generalizations. But in general, I suspect, there are precious few of us in this trial- and test-laden world of ours who happen truly, honestly, really to enjoy those trials and tests.

Whether it's pop quizzes or spelling bees, PSATs, SATS, GREs or GDEs; whether open-book, closed-book or blue-book; whether cholesterol test or EKG exam; productivity analysis or personality profile, credit check or character assessment--even with you exceptions to the rule, still, very few of us I would argue, who deep down feel right at home with, comfortable with and comforted by the prospect of being faced with them.

Especially of being faced with them alone.

Of having to sit alone at the little formica desk in the classroom, or on the hard-backed chair in a doctor's waiting room or in the cold interior of a corporate office waiting for the ax to fall-even on a wooden church pew, of having to sit, anxious heart clenched, sweaty hands gripped, and there anticipating the utter, awful loneliness of yourself being put on the line when the chopping starts.

Of being faced with an agonizing moral dilemma, handed a life-changing decision and then and there, of being found wanting--of your being found not capable enough, of not having studied enough, worked enough; of not being good enough, tough enough; not endowed with bodily health enough, blessed with spiritual strength enough--

Of being put on that line and believing--terrifyingly, finally believing--you are the only one there--this, I think, has to be the worst of all this test-taking we do in life:
the sheer loneliness of it all.

Of having to journey through the wilderness of this trial- and test-laden world,
our own smudgy, eraser-torn selves lying face down and vulnerable before all the powers of heaven and earth that be, and there believing ourselves to be all alone when the red marks start slashing.

Yet, that's not what we really believe, is it? Or not what we say we believe, what we confess we believe, anyway.

Even though any of us who have been living our lives more-or-less honestly, humanly on this planet--who acknowledge our deficiencies, who know all the ways during the course of our journeys, in thought, word, or deed, we have been found wanting--
Who have come to know for ourselves just how real those red shashes really are--

Even though we face these tests and these slashes of ours knowing and confessing how real they are--yet we do so also knowing and confessing--clinging in and with our faith to our belief--that we are not alone in the facing.

And the gospel story of Jesus in the wilderness is one on which and to which this faith of ours is invited to cling--the story of Jesus sitting, not at a desk, on a chair, or a church pew, but in a Scripturally unspecified part of the biblical wilderness. Sitting there, or, now 40 days out and with not a single calorie to eat, maybe more accurately lying there, face-down, skeletal and vulnerable--so famished that not even a butterfly is left in his stomach, when the devil decides to administer some tests.

Bible scholars tend to agree that in the story the devil--or "the Satan" as he is also sometimes called--is there with a mission, and it's actually a divine one:
To test just how capable this Messiah is--how able Jesus of Nazareth is to bear the weight of all that is to come as he journeys in the world in his mission to save the world.

We know in the story that, even starving and at death's door, still Jesus "aces" the three test questions the devil poses to him--but we also know from the Satan's own mouth that this is to be a two-part test.

Satan will be back.

Approximately 40 days after Lent's start, we know, don't we, from knowing the rest of the story, just how the test will be re-administered: Jesus will be alone again. This time there will be red slashes, and they will be very, very real. This time death's door will close behind him.

So what is it in this story, at Lent's beginning, to which our faith migiht especially cling? What is it as we journey deeper and deeper into Lent and into our lives--as test- and trial- laden as they are, as incapable as we will so often prove to be, and as alone as we can be so tempted to feel--what in this story can we hold onto?

Well, here's two things for right now:
We can hold onto our belief that in the story, out there in the lonely wilderness, Jesus is taking those tests of his all and only for us.

The same one who we believe gives his body and sheds his blood; who lives his life and dies his death for us--he is the one and he is the one alone who also now takes those tests for us too. Who, holding us in his heart, who takes them to let us, and to let all the powers of heaven and earth know, that in the worst of our test-taking moments; in the most unforgivingly wrong of our decisions made and the most mercilessly unfixable of our dilemmas resolved--that this Messiah is willing and able and ready to bear the responsibility of changing them.

"Do not put your God to the test," Jesus says to the devil today and yet, here's the incredible news--in the story, in Jesus, God putting God's own self to the test for us, and then acing it! Acing it, so that we in our own stories can be sure that God's forgiveness and mercy will be for us the only decision that counts and the only resolution that lasts.

So that when the rest of the story is resolved--when the opportune time comes and when death's door slams shut for us as well--now, in Jesus and now for us, the new story: the certainty of that door opening into--and only into--life.

For you--hold onto that.

Smudged and eraser-torn as we all are, now together turned and made clean and whole--and alive.

Tgether--Which brings me to the second part of the story to which we cling--and this, also our confession and belief, this looks into the face of that lonely wilderness of ours and right then and there, spits in its eye.

Spits in its eye--our belief not only that Jesus once entered a lonely biblical wilderness for
us, but that he did then, and does still today, with us.

As we believe we were there with him in his heart as his body grew weak with hunger, as the tests loomed and death's door beckoned--so we believe he is with us now. With us at our desks, in our chairs, on our pews, with us when the ax starts to chop, and with us when it seems like it will never stop chopping:
With us.

He comes and he journeys and he takes our tests with us. We are not alone--and we never will be.

The author Reynolds Price in his essay "Letters to a Man in the Fire" writes of the experience of an 87-year-old woman who faced some terrifying medical tests. Who, lying alone and scared on her hospital bed, sweaty hands clenched in prayer, envisioned herself suddenly on a Galilee hillside in a crowd gathered around a man where, she said, "I stood on the outskirts intending only to listen.

"But the man looked over the crowd right at me and then asked, 'What do you want?'

"I said, 'Could you send someone to come with me and help me through these tests, because I don't think I can manage them alone.'

"He thought for a minute and then said, 'How would it be if I came?'"

This, as we enter our Lenten journey, is something of what God would have us journey with: our deeper and deeper realization in our wilderness, in our tests, in our fears, not of how much we are moving nearer to, working harder to be with and for our God, but of how much, in Jesus, God is actually with and for us right now.

With us right now--tell each other that!--God our refuge and our fortress, as near as on our lips and as in our hearts, through every wilderness, in every test, God with us and for us now and forever.

I ask you--believing this, confessing this, together clinging to this and to this alone, I ask you:

How can we possibly fail anything?


Pastor Keiser's Message

The Bible: Food or Poison

Sermon for January 24, 2010
Gospel: Luke 4

One of the themes of the liturgy this morning is the Holy Scriptures.
• They are mentioned in the prayer of the day: “Lord God, you have caused the Holy Scriptures to be written for the nourishment of your people; grant that we may learn and inwardly digest them.”
• They are mentioned in Nehemiah: the people of Israel listened to the book of the law of Moses, which was probably our book of Deuteronomy, from early in the morning until the middle of the day… I don’t want to hear any more complaints about fifteen minute sermons.
• And finally, they are mentioned in Luke: Jesus, like a good rabbi, stands up in the synagogue and reads a passage of scripture for the congregation.

Since the liturgy is pushing us in this direction, today is probably as good a day as any to spend some time thinking about the meaning of the Bible in our lives.

Before getting into this, though, I should tell you that there are times when I wonder whether the Bible is really worth it. Don’t get me wrong: I love the Bible. Some of my most transformative experiences have been inspired by it.
• But every time some tells me that Barak Obama is the antichrist, I wonder if the good that the Bible does really outweighs the bad.
• Or every time I read a statistic like the one that says 45% of the American population believes the world was created about 10,000 years ago, just like it says in Genesis, I wonder if the good of the Bible outweighs the bad.
• Or every time someone tells me that gay people can’t be ordained, because the Bible clearly proscribes homosexuality. It makes me wonder if the Bible is really worth it.

The more I think about it, though, the more I realize that the problem isn’t the Bible; the problem is the people reading the Bible… or better yet, not reading the Bible but thinking they know what the Bible says.
• For instance, the antichrist that so many Christians seem obsessed about: it’s never mentioned in the Book of Revelation. And any 11th grade English student who reads the Book of Revelation should be able to figure out that the Beast refers to the Roman Empire, not some scary figure who is going to arise at the end of days and persecute all the Christians.
• Or the creations story in the book of Genesis: it’s not even written like history, so why are people reading it that way?
• Or the question about who can be ordained: I find it interesting that the Lutheran church has been ordaining divorced men and women for over a generation, even though the Bible speaks more stridently and more clearly against divorce than homosexuality. No one ever threatened to leave the ELCA over that. It makes you wonder if there is something more going on than how we read and interpret the Bible.

After years of doing Bible study with people, I’ve come to see that an awful lot of Christians approach the Bible in one of two ways:
• Some people use the Bible to show others that they are real Christians. The Bible becomes a kind of symbol for how devout a person is. They call themselves Bible-believing Christians, and they go to Bible churches, and they study at Bible colleges. They believe that the Bible should be read in public schools and plastered on the walls of public courthouses. Kind of like the American flag, the Bible becomes a political statement, a call to arms, something we have to fight to defend.
• The other approach to the Bible I find among Christians is a kind of embarrassment. They look at the Bible like they might look at an eccentric relative… someone they’re not quite sure how to deal with. They just hope no one draws any conclusions from the fact that they are related to this odd character. They would never want anyone to think they actually believe what’s in the Bible; they are far too sophisticated for that.

What I find interesting about the people in each of these groups is that few of them actually read the Bible… even the people who approach it as a symbol of orthodoxy. They may read a verse or two every week in church, but few of them have actually read the Bible from cover to cover. This is interesting, but not very surprising when you think about it, because the Bible can be pretty difficult to understand. It’s full of names and places that we haven’t heard of; sometimes it will say something in one place and then say something contradictory in another place; sometimes it says things about God that are quite troubling, describing God in ways that make Hitler look civil by comparison. No wonder so many people don’t bother to open it.

So how do we reconcile these two approaches to the Bible with the fact that every congregation of the Lutheran Church in America has in its constitution a statement that the Bible is the inspired Word of God? Do we really believe that? Do we want to believe that? Or what about the people in Nehemiah who wept when they heard the words of the Bible read? What accounts for that kind of response?

Well, here are a couple of things to keep in mind with regard to the Bible. First, the Bible takes interpretation. In Nehemiah, when Ezra read from the book of the law of Moses, the Levites were there to help interpret the Bible with the people. And after Jesus reads from the book of Isaiah, he sits down to offer some interpretation of what he just read. Whenever you read from a book as old as the Bible, you need to be able to interpret it in order to make sense of it in a modern context. The people who translate the Bible from the original languages, Hebrew and Greek, into English already make that first step of interpretation. Translation is interpretation. But then we have to take the interpretation further: what did a passage of scripture mean to the very first people who heard it; and what does it mean to us? What does a story about a shepherd that was originally told in a rural, nomadic, Ancient Near Eastern society, mean to post-industrial, urban Americans? It takes interpretation to figure this out.

But does that mean that anything goes when it comes to interpreting the Bible? Read into it whatever you want? No! The Bible itself gives us clues for how we should interpret it. For instance, Jesus tells the religious leaders of his day that the whole Bible rests on to two commandments: love the Lord with all your being; and love your neighbor as yourself. Those two commandments are a key for interpreting the Bible. So if a passage of scripture would lead you to think badly about God or your neighbor, you’re probably not interpreting it right.

An even more profound clue for interpreting the Bible comes to us in this morning’s Gospel reading. After Jesus read from the book of Isaiah, he sat down to interpret, and what did he say? “Today, this scripture has been fulfilled in your hearing.” What Jesus was saying is that he himself is the fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophecy. That’s a very Lutheran way of reading the Bible. Jesus would have made a good Lutheran. Lutherans believe that the whole point of the Bible is to introduce us to Jesus. The Bible is the Word of God, not because God sent it to us in God’s own handwriting, not because it was written by Moses or Peter or Paul. The Bible is the Word of God because it reveals Jesus, and Jesus is the living Word of God. Jesus is the Word of God with hands and feet and a brain to think and a heart to love.

Mark Allan Powell, a professor at Wartburg Seminary, puts it this way. Love the Bible. But the Bible will never love you back. Jesus WILL love you back. Jesus is the Good News that God speaks to the poor. Jesus is the word of freedom that God gives to the oppressed. Jesus is the word of vision that God gives to the blind. All the promises of salvation that we read in scripture are fulfilled in Jesus. And Jesus is the means by which these promises are fulfilled in us. Notice how he words that: today, these promises are being fulfilled in your hearing. In your hearing of the Good News, Jesus is present among you. Jesus comes into our lives to give us the freedom, the vision, and the encouragement that God intends for us.

Once you train your eyes to see Jesus in the Bible, the whole thing comes alive. You’re no longer bogged down in questions about historical accuracy or who wrote what. Instead of the Bible being a political statement or the source of embarrassment, it becomes, as Martin Luther put it, the manger that holds Christ. The Bible is the manger and we, like the shepherds, bend over it in sheer amazement and gratitude at what God has done for us.


Managing Director's Message

Good Works

“They are to do good, to be rich in good works, generous, and ready to share, thus storing up for themselves the treasure of a good foundation for the future, so that they may take hold of the life that really is life.” 1Tomothy 6:18-19

We have been richly blessed throughout the years at The Lutheran Church of the Holy Communion. We are blessed by the magnificent edifice in which we praise and worship our even more magnificent God. We are blessed by the pure and powerful notes our musicians raise heavenward to God’s glory. We are blessed that as we sometimes walk through hours darker than we ever knew life could hold, God uses Holy Communion’s ministries to reveal to us the Gospel light, the light no darkness can overcome.

The Gospel light is revealed through the Pastors’ deep compassion and care as well as through the faithful and personal ministry of Holy Communion’s entire membership.

It doesn’t take long for a visitor to recognize the storied history of our church. I am thankful that the talk in the church these days is not merely about its past accomplishments, but about our future as well. Through the adoption of our Vision Mission Direction Plan, I believe God is preparing this congregation to be used by him throughout our community. I hope each of you will continue to join our family as we take this journey of faith to see what God has in store for us—as individual believers and as a congregation..

Ronald R. Coolbaugh
Editor